two men and four women meeting in office

The interactive model of communication is a way for us to understand how communication works. It recognizes that all sources are affected by the behaviors and attitudes of other sources. The communicators in this model are not limited to two people, but can include many participants or messages. The interactive model views the communicators as mutually influencing each other when they exchange symbols.

Interactive model of communication is a process in which participants alternate positions as they act or react to the communication from others.

The interactive model of communication is based on the idea that communication is a process. In this process participants alternate positions as they act or react to communication from others. When communicating, participants go back and forth between being the sender, receiver, or both. In this model, a communication is delivered, received and interpreted, and a response is given. The process continues as the two interact. Communication is a two-way street, so it is important to take into account the reactions of others and act accordingly. The concept of turn-taking is illustrated by the circular flow model of communication.

This can be seen at any level of interaction between people. Whether it’s an individual speaking with another individual. Or two people conversing while walking down the street together. Or maybe several people working together on a project.

In this model, there is no single sender or receiver.

In this model, there is no single sender or receiver. The communicators are mutually influencing each other when they exchange symbols. A source’s behavior and attitude are determined by their interactions with others in their social network. The set of all possible communicators. For example, if someone posts an article about a new technology on Facebook and then comments on it. You can assume that this person has read it as well!

The idea behind this model is simple. Every communication event can be seen as having three parts: sender(s), message(s), and recipient(s). Each part plays a role in shaping how messages are received by recipients. Thus the term was coined to describe how all three pieces interact with each other over time

This model recognizes that all sources are affected by the behaviors and attitudes of other sources.

The interactive model of communication recognizes that all sources are affected by the behaviors and attitudes of other sources. Each participant’s behavior, thinking, and emotions affect the way others communicate with them. This means that when people interact with one another in real life (e.g., at work or school), they cannot avoid being influenced by their social surroundings. That is, everything from what they see on TV to what other people say about them personally affects how they think and act in their interactions with others.

This idea has several important implications. Firstly, it leads us to question whether we can ever really know anything for certain. Secondly, it suggests that if we want better relationships between ourselves then we need stop trying so hard at improving ourselves alone. Finally, it lets us understand why some groups might not get along despite having similar backgrounds or interests.

The interactive model views the communicators as mutually influencing each other when they exchange symbols.

The interactive model views the communicators as mutually influencing each other when they exchange symbols. This view is supported by a variety of empirical findings. Including studies that have shown that people often rely on others for information about their own attitudes or beliefs. For example, when asked to rate their agreement with statements such as “I feel good about myself” and “I am proud of my accomplishments”. Participants were more likely to rate themselves higher if they had just been given feedback from someone else. Indicating how well they felt about them (e.g., “You look great in this shirt”). Than if no one had told them anything at all (e.g., “You don’t look bad at all”).

In addition, research has demonstrated that people are better able to predict others’ behavior if they know some details about them. Even if those details have nothing do with what’s going on right now! For example, research shows that knowing someone’s favorite animal will allow you not only tell whether they’ll like certain movies but also predict whether they’ll get upset over specific situations. Such as being rejected by another person. You can do this much more accurately than would otherwise be possible without knowledge of their likes/dislikes beforehand. Knowing whether someone likes dogs will help determine whether they’ll get upset over being dropped off after work late one night. Knowing whether someone prefers tea over coffee may help decipher why they might get angry with their boss during an argument rather than just shrug it off before moving onto something else entirely.

Interactive model of communication is a way for us to understand how communication works.

Interactive model of communication is a way for us to understand how communication works. This model recognizes that all sources are affected by the behaviors and attitudes of other sources. Which in turn affect their own behaviors and attitudes. The communicators are viewed as mutually influencing each other when they exchange symbols (words, sounds).

This interactive model provides a better understanding of how people communicate. Because it focuses on mutual influence rather than individual motivation alone.

Major differences be interactive and the transactional model of communication

The transactional model of communication is a form of one-way communication where the sender provides information, and the receiver responds. In this model, there is no need for feedback because the parties do not collaborate with each other. The interactional model on the other hand is more likely to lead to healthy relationships. Because both parties need each other in order to achieve their goals or fulfil their needs.

In interactive model, the receiver can respond and feedback can be gotten

In this model, there is a clear connection between the sender and receiver. Which makes it easy for both parties to understand each other’s needs or wants. There are several ways in which one can reply back to another person:

  • The first way is by using verbal communication. Where you simply say what you want or think about something without any hesitation at all. Then later on if someone else wants to ask you more questions about it then they will come up with some ideas about how those things could be accomplished better than what was initially mentioned by them before giving advice on how those problems could be solved effectively enough so as not just waste time but also achieve positive results too!

In transactional model, the sender doesn’t wait to receive any feedback

In the transactional model, the sender doesn’t wait to receive any feedback from the receiver. The receiver can give feedback at any time and it will be appreciated by both parties. The sender does not have to wait for an answer from their counterpart before moving forward with their next steps in the conversation. Instead, they can make decisions based on what they learn from listening and observing what has been said so far. In order to better understand where this conversation may lead. As well as how best to move forward towards achieving common goals together.

In interactive communication, on the other hand, there is often a delay between when one person says something and when another responds back. Or doesn’t respond at all. This means that if someone says something without giving any indication that they want feedback on those statements made previously by doing anything else besides keeping up appearances then chances are good that person will not hear anything back even though he/she might really need them right now!

The parties in the transactional model do not collaborate with each other

The transactional model of communication is a one-way process in which the sender and receiver are equal, but the sender has more power. For example, if you want to give your friend a favor, you will ask them first before doing it yourself. However, if they don’t do it for you because they’re busy with other things and can’t help with this favor right now then there’s no point in asking again because they’ve already said no once already so there’s no point wasting anymore time talking about it when we both know what happened earlier on so let’s get on with our lives!

The purpose of this article was not just about explaining how different types of communication methods work but also about showing how different people perceive these methods differently depending on their own personal experiences with each method individually over time.”

The interactional model is more likely to lead to a healthy relationship

The interactional model is more likely to lead to a healthy relationship because it emphasizes the importance of mutual understanding and respect. The transactional model, on the other hand, emphasizes the exchange of information for its own sake. While this may be useful in some situations (for example, if you’re trying to sell a product), it’s less effective when you want someone else’s input on your ideas or opinions.

The transactional model is also more suitable for one-way communication like broadcasting: there’s no way for anyone else involved in the conversation (or even just listening) not feel like they’re being talked down on by having their opinion ignored or discounted outright.

Transactional model is more suitable for one way communication like broadcasting

The transactional model is more suitable for one way communication like broadcasting. In this case, the sender does not need to learn about the receiver’s preferences and needs and can use the same format in both directions of a transaction.

The transactional model is more effective than interactive communication due to its flexibility in adapting to different situations. For example, if you want your customer service representative or salesperson to provide their expertise on a particular topic but they do not know much about it yet (e.g., they have only been working at your company for six months), then there would be no reason why you would send them an email with some general advice on how best practices should be followed when dealing with customers who are experiencing issues related specifically within their field of expertise.’

Receiving feedback is an important part of interaction.

Feedback is an important part of interaction. Feedback can help you gain a better understanding of the other person, improve your communication skills, and get a better idea of what the other person is thinking.

For example: If your boss asks if you understand their expectations for this project and you say yes but don’t really understand them (or worse yet, don’t try at all), then that might be an opportunity for further discussion about where those expectations are coming from. Or maybe they are unclear because they haven’t communicated it well before now – so now would be the time to clarify! Either way there will be some sort of interaction between both parties because one person needs information from another in order for them both move forward together towards completion of task at hand

Conclusion

The interactive model of communication is a useful tool for understanding how people communicate with each other. It can be used in many different situations, including in classrooms and workplaces where there are multiple people talking at once. If you want to learn more about this topic, check out some of our other articles!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *